|
|
|
|
| The twisted world of The Typical Linux Nutcase. |
|
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
WOW!
I post a single message expressing my frustration over the documented
failure of Linux to properly support a very popular motherboard and
the screwballs come out of the wood work like some kind of army of
misguided ants heading for a picnic.
So far I have seen lot's of name calling, topic diverting and just
plain lying but still no concrete solution to my situation.
Maybe this is why Linux is still a fringe OS catering to nutcases and
anti-commercial hippies of the 2000's.
Like I stated, this board worked right from the start with Windows XP
and in fact works very nice.
Linux can't seem to match Windows support of common, popular hardware
so how on earth can anyone expect Linux to achieve any sort of market
share?
I predict Linux will stay exactly where it is now, in the back room
running on servers, as long as they don't use via6410 chipsets and
managed by a team of geeks that never see the real world and thus have
no clue, what is going on.
Much like the creatures of COLA.
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Olav Pettershagen wrote:
Pete Mycock wrote:
WOW!
I post a single message expressing my frustration over the documented
failure of Linux to properly support a very popular motherboard and
the screwballs come out of the wood work like some kind of army of
misguided ants heading for a picnic.
So far I have seen lot's of name calling, topic diverting and just
plain lying but still no concrete solution to my situation.
Maybe this is why Linux is still a fringe OS catering to nutcases and
anti-commercial hippies of the 2000's.
Like I stated, this board worked right from the start with Windows XP
and in fact works very nice.
Linux can't seem to match Windows support of common, popular hardware
so how on earth can anyone expect Linux to achieve any sort of market
share?
I predict Linux will stay exactly where it is now, in the back room
running on servers, as long as they don't use via6410 chipsets and
managed by a team of geeks that never see the real world and thus
have no clue, what is going on.
Much like the creatures of COLA.
Very insightful but you seem to have crossposted to a couple of Linux
groups :)
I imagine they (the linux lusers) need to know.
--
"Trust me"
|
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Pete Mycock wrote:
WOW!
I post a single message expressing my frustration over the documented
failure of Linux to properly support a very popular motherboard and
the screwballs come out of the wood work like some kind of army of
misguided ants heading for a picnic.
So far I have seen lot's of name calling, topic diverting and just
plain lying but still no concrete solution to my situation.
Maybe this is why Linux is still a fringe OS catering to nutcases and
anti-commercial hippies of the 2000's.
Like I stated, this board worked right from the start with Windows XP
and in fact works very nice.
Linux can't seem to match Windows support of common, popular hardware
so how on earth can anyone expect Linux to achieve any sort of market
share?
I predict Linux will stay exactly where it is now, in the back room
running on servers, as long as they don't use via6410 chipsets and
managed by a team of geeks that never see the real world and thus have
no clue, what is going on.
Much like the creatures of COLA.
Very insightful but you seem to have crossposted to a couple of Linux
groups :)
--
Olav P.
Linux 2.4.20-4GB-athlon
11:55pm up 6:16, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.09, 0.12
|
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
On 29 Feb 2004 14:47:54 -0800, tunick_pete@yahoo.com (Pete Mycock)
wrote:
WOW!
I post a single message expressing my frustration over the documented
failure of Linux to properly support a very popular motherboard and
the screwballs come out of the wood work like some kind of army of
misguided ants heading for a picnic.
So far I have seen lot's of name calling, topic diverting and just
plain lying but still no concrete solution to my situation.
Maybe this is why Linux is still a fringe OS catering to nutcases and
anti-commercial hippies of the 2000's.
Like I stated, this board worked right from the start with Windows XP
and in fact works very nice.
Linux can't seem to match Windows support of common, popular hardware
so how on earth can anyone expect Linux to achieve any sort of market
share?
I predict Linux will stay exactly where it is now, in the back room
running on servers, as long as they don't use via6410 chipsets and
managed by a team of geeks that never see the real world and thus have
no clue, what is going on.
Much like the creatures of COLA.
C.O.L.A in no shape or form is representative of the Linux community at
large.
Linux as a whole is growing in leaps and bounds while Windows has more
or less stagnated.
I gave you some links for the VIA problem.
Take a look and try them and get back to us, or email me if you need
more information.
flatfish+++
|
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Richard Doss wrote:
(snip)
What the hell is COLA?
It's a homosexual organization that advocates using linux.
--
"Trust me"
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Judas schrieb:
I imagine they (the linux lusers) need to know.
....another great attack from an OE-Looser.
BTW: You shouldn't fake your 'From:'-Adress
--
Warning: 10 days have passed since your last Windows reinstall.
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Ronny Stepken wrote:
Judas schrieb:
I imagine they (the linux lusers) need to know.
...another great attack from an OE-Looser.
What are you babbling about? "Looser" ?? As opposed to "Tighter"? What,
pray tell me, is OE-Looser, or OE-Tighter for that matter.
BTW: You shouldn't fake your 'From:'-Adress
Unlike ronny-stepken@nexgo.de I don't want SPAM.
Using your real mail address like ronny-stepken@nexgo.de invites SPAM.
It's not a good idea to use your address like ronny-stepken@nexgo.de because
the spammers harvest newsgroups looking for things like ronny-stepken@nexgo.de
so they can SPAM that address.
Not that you think about it, aren't you glad ronny-stepken@nexgo.de isn't your
real address?
--
"Trust me"
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Judas schrieb:
Richard Doss wrote:
(snip)
What the hell is COLA?
It's a homosexual organization that advocates using linux.
Once again, PLEASE fix your broken 'From:'-Adress.
BTW: If you want to talk about homosexuality, you might be in the wrong
group.
So, please, get a brain...
--
Warning: 10 days have passed since your last Windows reinstall.
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
"Pete Mycock" [tunick_pete@yahoo.com] wrote in message
news:4d059274.0402291447.1e8aa6e5@posting.google.com...
WOW!
I post a single message expressing my frustration over the documented
failure of Linux to properly support a very popular motherboard and
the screwballs come out of the wood work like some kind of army of
misguided ants heading for a picnic.
So far I have seen lot's of name calling, topic diverting and just
plain lying but still no concrete solution to my situation.
Maybe this is why Linux is still a fringe OS catering to nutcases and
anti-commercial hippies of the 2000's.
Like I stated, this board worked right from the start with Windows XP
and in fact works very nice.
Linux can't seem to match Windows support of common, popular hardware
so how on earth can anyone expect Linux to achieve any sort of market
share?
I predict Linux will stay exactly where it is now, in the back room
running on servers, as long as they don't use via6410 chipsets and
managed by a team of geeks that never see the real world and thus have
no clue, what is going on.
Much like the creatures of COLA.
Spot on!
--
D o t A u
Winfag since 1981.
Mini Cooper S Works - Buy me one now!, you cheap cunt...
|
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Judas schrieb:
Ronny Stepken wrote:
Judas schrieb:
I imagine they (the linux lusers) need to know.
...another great attack from an OE-Looser.
What are you babbling about? "Looser" ?? As opposed to "Tighter"? What,
pray tell me, is OE-Looser, or OE-Tighter for that matter.
You seem to be a little confused, where you should post your 'information'.
You like 'tool-time'? Maybe you'd like to be tacked?
BTW: You shouldn't fake your 'From:'-Adress
Unlike ronny-stepken@nexgo.de I don't want SPAM.
Using your real mail address like ronny-stepken@nexgo.de invites SPAM.
It's not a good idea to use your address like ronny-stepken@nexgo.de
because the spammers harvest newsgroups looking for things like
ronny-stepken@nexgo.de so they can SPAM that address.
Not that you think about it, aren't you glad ronny-stepken@nexgo.de isn't
your real address?
Why dont you mention it one more time: ronny-stepken@nexgo.de ?
Did you ever believe, that this could have hurd me, Windows-Weenie?
BTW: Isn't it time for a fup2?
Greetz
--
Warning: 10 days have passed since your last Windows reinstall.
|
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Ronny Stepken wrote:
Judas schrieb:
Ronny Stepken wrote:
Judas schrieb:
I imagine they (the linux lusers) need to know.
...another great attack from an OE-Looser.
What are you babbling about? "Looser" ?? As opposed to "Tighter"?
What, pray tell me, is OE-Looser, or OE-Tighter for that matter.
You seem to be a little confused, where you should post your
'information'. You like 'tool-time'? Maybe you'd like to be tacked?
BTW: You shouldn't fake your 'From:'-Adress
Unlike ronny-stepken@nexgo.de I don't want SPAM.
Using your real mail address like ronny-stepken@nexgo.de invites
SPAM. It's not a good idea to use your address like
ronny-stepken@nexgo.de because the spammers harvest newsgroups
looking for things like ronny-stepken@nexgo.de so they can SPAM that
address.
Not that you think about it, aren't you glad ronny-stepken@nexgo.de
isn't your real address?
Why dont you mention it one more time: ronny-stepken@nexgo.de ?
Did you ever believe, that this could have hurd me, Windows-Weenie?
BTW: Isn't it time for a fup2?
Greetz
Sorry, you're not worth bothering with.
Bye.
--
"Trust me"
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Pete Mycock wrote:
WOW!
I post a single message expressing my frustration over the documented
failure of Linux to properly support a very popular motherboard and
the screwballs come out of the wood work like some kind of army of
misguided ants heading for a picnic.
So far I have seen lot's of name calling, topic diverting and just
plain lying but still no concrete solution to my situation.
Maybe this is why Linux is still a fringe OS catering to nutcases and
anti-commercial hippies of the 2000's.
Like I stated, this board worked right from the start with Windows XP
and in fact works very nice.
Linux can't seem to match Windows support of common, popular hardware
so how on earth can anyone expect Linux to achieve any sort of market
share?
I predict Linux will stay exactly where it is now, in the back room
running on servers, as long as they don't use via6410 chipsets and
managed by a team of geeks that never see the real world and thus have
no clue, what is going on.
Much like the creatures of COLA.
Other than your childish tantrum because Linux doesn't work on your present
toy what's your point?
--
jasondebougainville@comcast.net
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
Judas schrieb:
Sorry, you're not worth bothering with.
Bye.
One of your well known tactics. You're not worth botherin either with.
Aber ich tue es, damit du hier nochmal Gelegenheitn hast, um gegen
Randgruppen aller Art zu revoltieren. Die Schwulen scheinen dir besonders
am Herz zu liegen.
Greetz
Ron
--
Warning: 10 days have passed since your last Windows reinstall.
|
|
[Original]
[Print]
[Top]
|
|
|
The content of this page is collected from Linux Forum, All copyrights and other associated rights are reserved by the original authors of the articles.